Lonestar20x20.gif

Twitter

Why Don’t Russian Men Marry Russian Women?

Why Don’t Russian Men Marry Russian Women?

Astonishing, isn’t it. There are thousands of beautiful Russian Women on the Internet. And all of them seemingly abandoned, left on the shelf.

The explanation is largely cultural. Most of us are attracted to Russian Women by their sexy, foreign accent. But if you already speak Russian, as most Russian Men do, the girls don’t sound at all foreign or sexy.

Another limiting factor is that the kind of women Russian Men date are usually already married to someone else.

Also, we must consider Russian demographics. There are far more men in Russia than women. I know this statistic is usually presented the other way around, but it is erroneous.

You will notice that in any sporting contests, - like the Olympic shot-put or weight-lifting - the Russian Women’s team regularly fails sex tests. It is also quite obvious to any casual traveller in Russia that all the women you see mending roads and driving trains are in fact men.

It is a complex subject and I will return to it later.

Back to Soviet Women FAQ’s Index

Share/Save/Bookmark

6,967 comments to Why Don’t Russian Men Marry Russian Women?

  • HopeySucks

    Fuck off Hopey, stay away from here, we all hate you!!

  • Igor

    You win!
    I unsubscribe from this site because
    ==========================
    Hurray!!! The mad bitch has gone!!!

  • Oksana

    Don’t be too optimistic, she will come back

  • HopeySucks

    She really is a crazy bitch

  • Electra

    At last it is safe to write here

  • Electra

    My news ARE - I am getting married.

  • The Real Scottish Girl

    Thank God, the horrible woman is gone. I didn’t even bother writing here - it was soo scary while she was here.

  • Jester

    I hav an amazing sex with my present girlfriend. WSho knows what the future holds?

  • HopeySucks

    She’s not gone for good, she will be back tomorrow, just wait and see…lol

  • Ornella

    she was horrible, wasn’t she?

  • Jenny

    Hope she has gone for good

  • Daniel

    She always says she’s not gonna write anymore but then comes back in a couple of hours.

  • Jester

    Well, you have to find something to do while you sit in the house all day.

  • Ornella

    Guys, don’t be so mean! This forum is all she has!

  • wondering

    A lot of people say how Ruski women are gold-diggers and only after one thing. Money.
    Well, a lot of those wise-guys should come and sit in the Family Court here in Australia and see what females do to their former husbands. They’re like Funnel Web spiders. They let the man screw them to put him off his guard; then screw him again for everything he’s got and then try and drive him insane, just for a bonus.

  • Oksana

    Hopey is disgusting. Any white woman who would let a stinky Arab or black man shove his smelly penis inside of her, is a degenerate pig with no self-respect. Absolutely abhorrent and sickening.

  • RJ

    she piss of shit)))))))))))))

  • M S

    If a woman just for men seeking sex, why they are surprised when they are looking only for money?

  • Hopey

    http://kathmanduk2.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/black-history-month-welfare-in-black-and-white/. jester, your gf never loved you and nobody has ever loved you or ever will. You pump feces, you don’t have sex. You are disgusting pervert and everybody who is with you doesn’t care about you, they pretend for the money. nobody can possibly like this shit. Daniel, you are an old and ugly alcoholic pedophile, you deserve what is happening to you. Hope you end up in the street with your hooker!!!!!

  • Ornella

    Wow, Hopey almost made 8 hours without trolling! Very impressive.

  • Masha

    Hopey, regarding the article you provided the link for… I’m quoting: “todays Baby Boomers by their working have paid for ther elderly and retired “WWII Generation” to receive pension and retirement benefits from social security, as well as disability benefits”. This article just proves that you’re completely clueless about what’s going on in the USA. You dug up some Black History Month article where they make a comparison between black people and participants of WW2(!!!), who are 85+ years old, also Vietnam war soldiers, and people on disability who lost arms and legs in Iraq and Afghanistan! These are innocent people who got screwed by the government, got their lives,brains and bodies fucked up for this piece of shit government that completely shits on them, and they are to be compared to niggers on welfare??!!!! And you are the one who cares about people? Really? Just for you to know vast majority of black people in the USA hates white people for their existence, claim they deserve reparations for slavery (!!!!!), get pregnant with purpose of getting bigger tax returns, majority of people in prison is black nevertheless white population outnumbers black so far (not for long thought LOL), The drug dealers, killers and burglars are 90% black. You are the one who loves statistics, don’t ya? Go figure it out for yourself. You have no idea.
    I don’t mind paying taxes in order to support older people and the ones who protected this country but when perfectly healthy people have enormous amount of kids in order to not be working then I have problem with that. And niggers are proud to live off of you. Watch this monkey’s reasoning: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ8g_64Dmug Most of them feel this way

  • Masha

    “Hopey is disgusting. Any white woman who would let a stinky Arab or black man shove his smelly penis inside of her, is a degenerate pig with no self-respect. Absolutely abhorrent and sickening.”
    Well done, Oksana, very true! High five, girl

  • Fa

    Statistics are not mine. They are government statistics !
    Masha, do you understand that words that you say can have consequences? Manhattan is not unlimited street and there are only handful of Mashas from Russia who study at a US University in NY area and for those who want it will be able to figure out who you are. You already stated your age as 22. The rest is easy.
    What will be if some black person sees the shit you type here, or someone links them to this forum?

  • Fa

    Oksana, you understand that Jesus Christ had middle eastern (semite)appereance, you understand that Jesus Christ was neither blond nor blue eyed?
    You call yourself a Christian, Oksana?

  • Fa

    Oksana, do you understand that British people that you suck up to were raping- destroying -colonizing half of the world throughout history, the autrocities that have been done to Irish and Scottish population alone on their own land are ungodly let alone what was done at the colonies.
    Do you understand that British elites together with European elites are closely linked to pedophilia and child molesting, that they actually worship satan, that they killed princess Diana the very same way she said Charles threatened to kill if he knew she was with an Arab. Do you know that when prince Philip says (on camera! on youtube!) that world needs 95% population reduction (which they are trying to implement ) he is just a kind soul who is joking and most importantly that you, personally Oksana, will be spared???
    Keep being a racist pig.

  • Fa

    Blair’s Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End For His Career

    Mike James

    NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used
    his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

    On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish town of Dunblane.

    The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government’s antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities.

    As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and Counter Punch, and by the Sunday Herald’s Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that “a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”

    Some commentators, mindful that one of Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child pornography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

    The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord Cullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local Labour luminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy’s club. Hamilton was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

    The rumours and allegations concerning Lord Robertson’s ties to Hamilton, and the possibility that the American intelligence services may be blackmailing Tony Blair into continued support for a U.S. invasion of Iraq, have been given fire by internet investigator and intelligence expert Michael Keaney:

    “An additional, and potentially explosive, aspect of US leverage over Blair is the FBI’s investigation of users of child porn websites which has already claimed a number of high profile scalps. [....] The biggest two fish that come to mind are indeed high profile: firstly there is George Robertson, who today has announced that he will step down as NATO Secretary General after four years and two months in the job. Were he to be fingered the fall out would be spectacular but short-lived — he’s been a long time out of the cabinet and is sufficiently distant from Tony to be regarded as not requiring the presentational finesse of a “rolling” Cabinet committee, whatever that might be. However, our second candidate is most certainly very closely identified with the prime minister, and retains a high profile [and] continues to operate at a very high level indeed, whether in Europe, Japan, or even the Middle East.”

    “Peter Mandelson began political life as a member of the Communist Party, soon “seeing the light” and instead getting involved with the CIA/MI6-financed Socialist International youth wing and the Labour Party, through which he rose in parallel with his experience working at London Weekend Television with other A-list regulars like John Birt and Michael Maclay, now public mouthpiece of Hakluyt, the private sector spook outfit run by a bunch of “ex” MI6 types including the widow of ex-Labour leader John Smith. This sort of background and connections makes Mandelson very useful in the sort of corridors-and-alleyways diplomacy and networking that is the real substance of international relations and intelligence gathering. [....] If Mandelson is indeed the suspect, then the damage this could cause may fatally wound Blair.”

    “An interesting development that may, or may not, be related to this, is the publication of an article in last Sunday’s Observer by David Aaronovitch. He and Mandelson are longtime friends, having been together in the Communist Party and at London Weekend TV. Aaronovitch was, until recently, a leading political commentator for the Independent, on whose “international advisory board” (the standard vanity collection of august persons put together for the ego of newspaper proprietors like Tony O’Reilly and Conrad Black) sits Peter Mandelson.”

    “Since switching to the Guardian Media Group at the beginning of this year or thereabouts, Aaronovitch authored an article on child abuse in which he pleads for common sense to prevail, rather than the lynch mob: ‘Strangely I trust the police to act sensibly (because, like the analysts, theyâ??ve seen it all): it’s the rest of us I worry about.’”

    “That much depends upon the behaviour of the US Justice Department, which ultimately has responsibility for the investigation, must be a worry for Blair. One need only imagine how this must colour the views of John Ashcroft regarding the moral fibre of British cabinet ministers and the laxity of the prime minister who chose them in the first place. How easy would it be for the suspect to be named in a story that miraculously surfaced outside of the UK (thereby circumventing the D Notice and leading potentially to a re-run of the Spycatcher fiasco of 1987)?

    “Whoever is on the suspects’ list, we can see that already this ‘rolling’ cabinet committee is busy leaking stories that serve at least to delay the shock of the inevitable, eventual revelation, buying valuable time if nothing else. Thus you can depend on the Guardian to save the day for Tony, and here’s some helpful tip-offs courtesy of MI6 that help to distract from what’s really going on, whilst bolstering the reputation for integrity and financial propriety that has marked Blair’s dealings with businesspeople like Bernie Ecclestone, Richard Desmond, Lakshmi Mittal, etc.”

    “I have come to the considered conclusion,” says a correspondent of Keaney, William Palfreman, “that the events surrounding the Dunblane massacre, and the subsequent submissions to the Cullen enquiry that have been put under to 100 years of secrecy, far out weigh in political significance issues such as our opposition to the EU [and] what it entails. It is inconceivable that T Blair, Jack Straw [and] Gordon Brown can survive in office as this matter becomes known. It totally undermines the Labour government, and could easily be a case of the Queen feeling she has to use reserve powers to call an emergency general election, such would be the loss of confidence.”

    “This scandal is far more important that anything that has happened here in living memory, in fact I can think of no parallel for it. It certainly pisses all over anything that happened to Kennedy or was done by Nixon. I am surprised, given the gravity of this matter, that [an] attempt has yet to be made on his life, for surely we are dealing with desperate people here. It also explains a few strange things, such as just why T Blair & co. were so keen to ban all handguns, and why such obviously talentless nobodies like George Robertson have risen from being backbench nobodies a couple of years ago to Defence Secretary, and now Secretary-General of Nato.”

    “[....] Now where in this is there a national security risk so great, that documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be held for 100 years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas Hamilton’s application for a gun licence was turned down, due to him being regarded as a man of unsound character [and] him being the object of several paedophilia investigations, did his MP, our friend George Robertson (now Lord Robertson, Secretary-General of NATO), write him a glowing character reference, and personally see to it that his application was successful, when he knew the grounds for the original refusal were because he was suspected of procuring boys for sexual services?”

    “Or take a certain boat seized on Loch Ness [Loch Lomond] by the Strathclyde Police. It is a very rare thing for assets to be seized in the UK, as [there] are no asset-forfeiture laws. When it does happen, there is normally a trial at least, with things only being seized if they are proven to be bought with money proven to be consequence of a proven crime. Even then, they are sold by public auction. How come, then, was this very valuable boat sold for the tiny sum of Ð?5000, without an auction, to none other than our friend Thomas Hamilton, a man of no financial means whatsoever, nor a sailor, nor lived anywhere near any open water. Why did not the boats owners complain about having their property stolen from them in this manner? I can only conclude because it was being used for some very serious criminal activity, and those on board were merely glad to escape prosecution. Also, it seems rather odd in such circumstances that not only were the owners happy to avoid prosecution enough to lose a valuable boat, but that the Strathclyde Police were not willing to prosecute. And yet, after these improbable events, it wound up in none other than our friend Hamilton’s hands. Could he have been a blackmailer as well as a paedophile?”

    “But the main thing is what might explain sections of the public enquiry are now under the hundred year rule. There are only three levels of secrecy in the UK for state secrets, the 30 year rule, the 80 year rule and the 100 year rule. Normal secrets, like Cabinet discussions, government papers, espionage, all that, are under the 30 year rule. Only a very small number of things ever reached the 80 year rule, particularly events in the Sudan with Kitchener in 1902, where it seems that an act of genocide was committed, and some things that happened 1914-18, as well as things like potential peace negotiations in 1941, and just about everything to do with the IRA (after all, people are still alive after 30 years) come under the 80 year rule. Of them, the darkest of state secrets, when the events of ‘02 were getting a bit close to their limit for comfort, a further class of secrets was created to last a hundred years, and tiny number of things were put in it - e.g. Kitchener in ‘02, some World War I things.”

    But none of these things can be said to apply to Dunblane. That was a case of a common criminal [and] sexual pervert committing some fairly ordinary murders, of a kind that happen from time to time. Even if a backbench Labour MP was implicated, or may have been involved in a large paedophile ring in Scotland, that is not a matter of vital national importance. You have a prosecution, there is a bit of a scandal, everyone is disgusted and one MP goes to prison. Big deal: such things happen. You certainly would not make such information a state secret just to save one unnamed backbench nobody’s miserable neck. Governments simply don’t go to such extreme lengths to save nobodies - power broking just doesn’t work like that. There must be issues of profound national importance working here, and I put it to you that anything that involves certain events in Scotland is more likely to be someone of cabinet level than anything else.

    If the physiologically flawed [although Thomas Hamilton was these were the words of Tony Blair when speaking of Gordon Brown] Thomas Hamilton was the centre of a paedophile ring in Scotland that procured boys to people of the amongst the highest rank, and Tony Blair [and] Jack Straw covered this up by the Official Secrets Act (They would do the covering, as both the Prime Minister’s [and] Home Secretary’s permission is needed to put some something under the 100 year rule.) it is hard to see how they or their close colleges could possibly remain in office, even if they were never inclined to such flawed behaviour themselves. The government would fall.”

    That prospect seems to be energising a government now considered to be fighting for its political life, even to the extent of killing the review process by which some of the banned sections of the Cullen Report would be made public, arguing that freedom of information would somehow harm other abused children in Dunblane.

    In a recent interview with the Guardian newspaper, Michael Matheson, the Scottish National Party’s shadow deputy justice minister, said: “There are more documents covered by the 100-year rule than this police report. Some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with children. We need to look at why such a lengthy ban has been imposed on them. I have been contacted by a number of families affected by the tragedy who are anxious to ensure this information becomes public. And so far we have no guarantee that it will. We only have a review.”

    “It is important we make available, if it is at all possible, any information that is available about people in the public eye,” said the Scottish first minister, Jack McConnell.

    When Tony Blair took office following a landslide victory in 1997, few commentators would have suggested that this man would be willing to drag his country into a war of unjustified aggression against a people that have done no harm to the British public. Nor would anyone have surmised that a Labour government would hitch its political fortunes to a shabby cabal of fanatical neoconservative Zionists working to make real their much-touted biblical Armageddon. And no one could have predicted that Blair’s nominally “Christian” administration would transform itself into a licentious club of flamboyant homosexual cruisers and out-of-control paedophiles.

    But it is now becoming shockingly clear that the slavish adherence of Tony Blair and Jack Straw to the Bush line on Iraq may have less to do with principled arguments, and much more to do with the fear of CIA and FBI revelations that would make them two of the most hated politicians in modern British political history.

    There is only one way out for Tony Blair - resign.

    (The British Labour government, 1997-2003. Rest In Peace.)

  • Fa

    Blair’s Protection of Elite Paedophile Rings Spells the End For His Career

    Mike James

    NATO boss and Blair government insider Lord Robertson has threatened to sue Scotland’s leading independent newspaper over internet allegations that he not only used
    his influence as a Freemason to procure a gun licence for child killer Thomas Hamilton, but was also a member of a clandestine paedophile ring reportedly set up by Hamilton for the British elite.

    On 13 March 1996, Hamilton, armed with four hand-guns, opened fire on a junior school class, killing 16 children and one teacher before turning the gun on himself, shattering forever the idyllic 13th century Scottish town of Dunblane.

    The controversy is certain to topple the Blair government, which has already issued a D-Notice to gag the press from revealing the names of known paedophiles within the British executive, including at least two senior ministers; and the case highlights the government’s antipathy toward the Sunday Herald and its brand of independent journalism that has, among other things, exposed the role played by the domestic security agency, MI5, in helping the IRA to carry out terrorist atrocities.

    As reported by this journalist last month at Propaganda Matrix and Counter Punch, and by the Sunday Herald’s Home Affairs Editor, Neil Mackay, the British intelligence services are actively engaged in preventing any further child sex revelations that could incite further hostility to an already unpopular Prime Minister and destroy the morale of troops set to invade Iraq. An intelligence officer told Mackay that “a ‘rolling’ Cabinet committee had been set up to work out how to deal with the potentially ruinous fall-out for both Tony Blair and the government if arrests occur.”

    Some commentators, mindful that one of Tony Blair’s closest confidante’s is a practising paedophile, are even suggesting that this particular scandal, and not Blair’s repeated lies and fabricated reports in regard to Iraq, may well prove the downfall of a government mired in sleaze and corruption. The Sunday Times is reported to have obtained an FBI list of Labour MPs who have used credit cards to pay for internet child por n ography, and Blair has responded by imposing a massive news blackout, failing however to stop the arrest of one of his most important aides, Phillip Lyon.

    The latest allegations came to light following a campaign to lift the secrecy on the Dunblane massacre. Large sections of the police report were banned from the public domain under a 100-year secrecy order. Lord Cullen, an establishment insider, also omitted and censored references to the documents in his final report. Parents and teachers were advised to concentrate their efforts on a campaign to outlaw handguns instead of focusing on how the mentally unstable Freemason, already known by the police to be a paedophile, had obtained a firearms licence for six handguns. Hamilton allegedly enjoyed good relations with both local Labour luminary George Robertson and Michael Forsyth, the then Scottish Secretary of State and MP for Stirling. Forsyth congratulated and encouraged Hamilton for running a boy’s club. Hamilton was also found to have exchanged letters with the British monarch, Queen Elizabeth.

    The rumours and allegations concerning Lord Robertson’s ties to Hamilton, and the possibility that the American intelligence services may be blackmailing Tony Blair into continued support for a U.S. invasion of Iraq, have been given fire by internet investigator and intelligence expert Michael Keaney:

    “An additional, and potentially explosive, aspect of US leverage over Blair is the FBI’s investigation of users of child porn websites which has already claimed a number of high profile scalps. [....] The biggest two fish that come to mind are indeed high profile: firstly there is George Robertson, who today has announced that he will step down as NATO Secretary General after four years and two months in the job. Were he to be fingered the fall out would be spectacular but short-lived — he’s been a long time out of the cabinet and is sufficiently distant from Tony to be regarded as not requiring the presentational finesse of a “rolling” Cabinet committee, whatever that might be. However, our second candidate is most certainly very closely identified with the prime minister, and retains a high profile [and] continues to operate at a very high level indeed, whether in Europe, Japan, or even the Middle East.”

    “Peter Mandelson began political life as a member of the Communist Party, soon “seeing the light” and instead getting involved with the CIA/MI6-financed Socialist International youth wing and the Labour Party, through which he rose in parallel with his experience working at London Weekend Television with other A-list regulars like John Birt and Michael Maclay, now public mouthpiece of Hakluyt, the private sector spook outfit run by a bunch of “ex” MI6 types including the widow of ex-Labour leader John Smith. This sort of background and connections makes Mandelson very useful in the sort of corridors-and-alleyways diplomacy and networking that is the real substance of international relations and intelligence gathering. [....] If Mandelson is indeed the suspect, then the damage this could cause may fatally wound Blair.”

    “An interesting development that may, or may not, be related to this, is the publication of an article in last Sunday’s Observer by David Aaronovitch. He and Mandelson are longtime friends, having been together in the Communist Party and at London Weekend TV. Aaronovitch was, until recently, a leading political commentator for the Independent, on whose “international advisory board” (the standard vanity collection of august persons put together for the ego of newspaper proprietors like Tony O’Reilly and Conrad Black) sits Peter Mandelson.”

    “Since switching to the Guardian Media Group at the beginning of this year or thereabouts, Aaronovitch authored an article on child abuse in which he pleads for common sense to prevail, rather than the lynch mob: ‘Strangely I trust the police to act sensibly (because, like the analysts, theyâ??ve seen it all): it’s the rest of us I worry about.’”

    “That much depends upon the behaviour of the US Justice Department, which ultimately has responsibility for the investigation, must be a worry for Blair. One need only imagine how this must colour the views of John Ashcroft regarding the moral fibre of British cabinet ministers and the laxity of the prime minister who chose them in the first place. How easy would it be for the suspect to be named in a story that miraculously surfaced outside of the UK (thereby circumventing the D Notice and leading potentially to a re-run of the Spycatcher fiasco of 1987)?

    “Whoever is on the suspects’ list, we can see that already this ‘rolling’ cabinet committee is busy leaking stories that serve at least to delay the shock of the inevitable, eventual revelation, buying valuable time if nothing else. Thus you can depend on the Guardian to save the day for Tony, and here’s some helpful tip-offs courtesy of MI6 that help to distract from what’s really going on, whilst bolstering the reputation for integrity and financial propriety that has marked Blair’s dealings with businesspeople like Bernie Ecclestone, Richard Desmond, Lakshmi Mittal, etc.”

    “I have come to the considered conclusion,” says a correspondent of Keaney, William Palfreman, “that the events surrounding the Dunblane massacre, and the subsequent submissions to the Cullen enquiry that have been put under to 100 years of secrecy, far out weigh in political significance issues such as our opposition to the EU [and] what it entails. It is inconceivable that T Blair, Jack Straw [and] Gordon Brown can survive in office as this matter becomes known. It totally undermines the Labour government, and could easily be a case of the Queen feeling she has to use reserve powers to call an emergency general election, such would be the loss of confidence.”

    “This scandal is far more important that anything that has happened here in living memory, in fact I can think of no parallel for it. It certainly pisses all over anything that happened to Kennedy or was done by Nixon. I am surprised, given the gravity of this matter, that [an] attempt has yet to be made on his life, for surely we are dealing with desperate people here. It also explains a few strange things, such as just why T Blair & co. were so keen to ban all handguns, and why such obviously talentless nobodies like George Robertson have risen from being backbench nobodies a couple of years ago to Defence Secretary, and now Secretary-General of Nato.”

    “[....] Now where in this is there a national security risk so great, that documents part of the public enquiry are now state secrets to be held for 100 years? Funny kind of public enquiry. Why, when Thomas Hamilton’s application for a gun licence was turned down, due to him being regarded as a man of unsound character [and] him being the object of several paedophilia investigations, did his MP, our friend George Robertson (now Lord Robertson, Secretary-General of NATO), write him a glowing character reference, and personally see to it that his application was successful, when he knew the grounds for the original refusal were because he was suspected of procuring boys for sexual services?”

    “Or take a certain boat seized on Loch Ness [Loch Lomond] by the Strathclyde Police. It is a very rare thing for assets to be seized in the UK, as [there] are no asset-forfeiture laws. When it does happen, there is normally a trial at least, with things only being seized if they are proven to be bought with money proven to be consequence of a proven crime. Even then, they are sold by public auction. How come, then, was this very valuable boat sold for the tiny sum of Ð?5000, without an auction, to none other than our friend Thomas Hamilton, a man of no financial means whatsoever, nor a sailor, nor lived anywhere near any open water. Why did not the boats owners complain about having their property stolen from them in this manner? I can only conclude because it was being used for some very serious criminal activity, and those on board were merely glad to escape prosecution. Also, it seems rather odd in such circumstances that not only were the owners happy to avoid prosecution enough to lose a valuable boat, but that the Strathclyde Police were not willing to prosecute. And yet, after these improbable events, it wound up in none other than our friend Hamilton’s hands. Could he have been a blackmailer as well as a paedophile?”

    “But the main thing is what might explain sections of the public enquiry are now under the hundred year rule. There are only three levels of secrecy in the UK for state secrets, the 30 year rule, the 80 year rule and the 100 year rule. Normal secrets, like Cabinet discussions, government papers, espionage, all that, are under the 30 year rule. Only a very small number of things ever reached the 80 year rule, particularly events in the Sudan with Kitchener in 1902, where it seems that an act of genocide was committed, and some things that happened 1914-18, as well as things like potential peace negotiations in 1941, and just about everything to do with the IRA (after all, people are still alive after 30 years) come under the 80 year rule. Of them, the darkest of state secrets, when the events of ‘02 were getting a bit close to their limit for comfort, a further class of secrets was created to last a hundred years, and tiny number of things were put in it - e.g. Kitchener in ‘02, some World War I things.”

    But none of these things can be said to apply to Dunblane. That was a case of a common criminal [and] sexual pervert committing some fairly ordinary murders, of a kind that happen from time to time. Even if a backbench Labour MP was implicated, or may have been involved in a large paedophile ring in Scotland, that is not a matter of vital national importance. You have a prosecution, there is a bit of a scandal, everyone is disgusted and one MP goes to prison. Big deal: such things happen. You certainly would not make such information a state secret just to save one unnamed backbench nobody’s miserable neck. Governments simply don’t go to such extreme lengths to save nobodies - power broking just doesn’t work like that. There must be issues of profound national importance working here, and I put it to you that anything that involves certain events in Scotland is more likely to be someone of cabinet level than anything else.

    If the physiologically flawed [although Thomas Hamilton was these were the words of Tony Blair when speaking of Gordon Brown] Thomas Hamilton was the centre of a paedophile ring in Scotland that procured boys to people of the amongst the highest rank, and Tony Blair [and] Jack Straw covered this up by the Official Secrets Act (They would do the covering, as both the Prime Minister’s [and] Home Secretary’s permission is needed to put some something under the 100 year rule.) it is hard to see how they or their close colleges could possibly remain in office, even if they were never inclined to such flawed behaviour themselves. The government would fall.”

    That prospect seems to be energising a government now considered to be fighting for its political life, even to the extent of killing the review process by which some of the banned sections of the Cullen Report would be made public, arguing that freedom of information would somehow harm other abused children in Dunblane.

    In a recent interview with the Guardian newspaper, Michael Matheson, the Scottish National Party’s shadow deputy justice minister, said: “There are more documents covered by the 100-year rule than this police report. Some of them have nothing whatsoever to do with children. We need to look at why such a lengthy ban has been imposed on them. I have been contacted by a number of families affected by the tragedy who are anxious to ensure this information becomes public. And so far we have no guarantee that it will. We only have a review.”

    “It is important we make available, if it is at all possible, any information that is available about people in the public eye,” said the Scottish first minister, Jack McConnell.

    When Tony Blair took office following a landslide victory in 1997, few commentators would have suggested that this man would be willing to drag his country into a war of unjustified aggression against a people that have done no harm to the British public. Nor would anyone have surmised that a Labour government would hitch its political fortunes to a shabby cabal of fanatical neoconservative Zionists working to make real their much-touted biblical Armageddon. And no one could have predicted that Blair’s nominally “Christian” administration would transform itself into a licentious club of flamboyant homosexual cruisers and out-of-control paedophiles.

    But it is now becoming shockingly clear that the slavish adherence of Tony Blair and Jack Straw to the Bush line on Iraq may have less to do with principled arguments, and much more to do with the fear of CIA and FBI revelations that would make them two of the most hated politicians in modern British political history.

    There is only one way out for Tony Blair - resign.

    (The British Labour government, 1997-2003. Rest In Peace.)

  • Masha

    I like new name Fa, like an old deodorant… No need to threaten me with consequences as there is such a thing as freedom of speech in the USA. I’m not planning on becoming a politician in this country, you know. However you have nothing to say about my argument cause your statistics show dead numbers, nothing more. There is no real facts behind them, like the fact that white people on welfare who get sent to war and get injured and disabled to work, but want to compare them to perfectly healthy black people who REFUSE to work, thinking society owes them since their ancestors were slaves ( even though Russia stopped slavery way after the US where slaves were actually white). Come to the US and see it for yourself. You’ll find out how it’s OK to call a white person a pussy, a cracker, a honkie… You’re thinking it’s great to get fucked by black guys, go ahead and do it. They’ll be happy to “help” you out since they don’t care what to fuck. They have no morals or feelings and you are just a piece of white trash to them. All I see is 95% of them are half-animals, who don’t give a fuck about their kids and have no moral standards. Then you wanna sit here saying you don’t mind working for them: good luck being a druged-up prostitute who lives for another couple of years since drugs and prostitution is the only business they own.

  • Masha

    I’m wondering if anybody even bothered to read 2 of your previous posts. I sure didn’t.

  • Fa

    Ever wonder to yourself, why some men practise anal sex?
    Because a female body, smaller than a man’s, especially white and skinny from behind looks exactly like a boy’s body and that’s as close as they can get, legally to fulfilling their fantasy which is on DNA level with some. In essence this form of sex is about establishing your power over somebody weaker. But they never admit it, even to themselves, that they get off degrading someone, someone weaker and that they feed on energy of terror and rejoice in abuse. Their psyche will keep justifying themselves in their own eyes by reiforcing that it is normal and there is nothing wrong with this and that in fact a woman enjoys it and that they have “great sex”. It is called self preservation of psyche.

  • Fa

    Truth is, Oksana, that you are a wanna be, think you are so superior, you will never be part of elite, you eat the same food, drink the same water and work at same jobs as most of non whites in England do.
    Had you known personally and had you dinned and brushed your shoulders with white elite, you would have known who those people are it is not a subject of bragging.
    You blame me for fucking an arab? Look what is being done in Thailand by British pentioners, Dutch, etc, how they lead underage boys to the bushes on the beaches for a hundred of Baht, and then come back to England and be the proper white family men.
    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/globalist_sex_trade.html

  • Masha

    “Oksana, that you are a wanna be, think you are so superior, you will never be part of elite, ”
    You certainly won’t be either :D
    Blame you for fucking an arab? Maybe not if you weren’t talking shit on arabs yourself, hypocrite. You must have some kind of a memory loss. Read your own posts!

  • Masha

    I like new name Fa, like an old deodorantâ?¦ No need to threaten me with consequences as there is such a thing as freedom of speech in the USA. Iâ??m not planning on becoming a politician in this country, you know. However you have nothing to say about my argument cause your statistics show dead numbers, nothing more. There is no real facts behind them, like the fact that white people on welfare who get sent to war and get injured and disabled to work, but want to compare them to perfectly healthy black people who REFUSE to work, thinking society owes them since their ancestors were slaves ( even though Russia stopped slavery way after the US where slaves were actually white). Come to the US and see it for yourself. Youâ??ll find out how itâ??s OK to call a white person a pussy, a cracker, a honkieâ?¦ Youâ??re thinking itâ??s great to get fucked by black guys, go ahead and do it. Theyâ??ll be happy to â??helpâ?? you out since they donâ??t care what to fuck. They have no morals or feelings and you are just a piece of white trash to them. All I see is 95% of them are half-animals, who donâ??t give a fuck about their kids and have no moral standards. Then you wanna sit here saying you donâ??t mind working for them: good luck being a druged-up prostitute who lives for another couple of years since drugs and prostitution is the only business they own.

  • Masha

    I like new name Fa, like an old deodorantâ?¦ No need to threaten me with consequences as there is such a thing as freedom of speech in the USA. Iâ??m not planning on becoming a politician in this country, you know. However you have nothing to say about my argument cause your statistics show dead numbers, nothing more. There is no real facts behind them, like the fact that white people on welfare who get sent to war and get injured and disabled to work, but want to compare them to perfectly healthy black people who REFUSE to work, thinking society owes them since their ancestors were slaves ( even though Russia stopped slavery way after the US where slaves were actually white). Come to the US and see it for yourself. Youâ??ll find out how itâ??s OK to call a white person a pussy, a cracker, a honkieâ?¦ Youâ??re thinking itâ??s great to get fucked by black guys, go ahead and do it. Theyâ??ll be happy to â??helpâ?? you out since they donâ??t care what to fuck. They have no morals or feelings and you are just a piece of white trash to them. All I see is 95% of them are half-animals, who donâ??t give a fuck about their kids and have no moral standards. Then you wanna sit here saying you donâ??t mind working for them: good luck being a druged-up prostitute who lives for another couple of years since drugs and prostitution is the only business they own.

  • Fa

    Masha, I don’t mean your political career when I say you maybe held responsible for words you say. Far from it.

    You want to dismiss statistics of US Government, that includes WW2 vets and Vietnam vets. Why should it exclude them if they are still alife and if they still receive welfare?

    It was YOU who alleged that welfare was bad. I never said such thing. It’s a pity you can’t deal with the truth and the facts.

  • Fa

    http://www.geo.ru/puteshestviya/otkuda-vzyalsya-angliiskii-bunt?page=2

    What is this report about, Masha? Are there black people in the pictures?

  • Masha

    Oh, I can deal with the truth and facts unlike you. Black people take a complete advantage using the system while being perfectly capable of working, nevertheless people like you say it’s wrong to judge them for being lazy drug-addicts and we should all provide food, shelter and med insurance for them since you are not supposed to judge by the color but it’s Ok for them to be racist towards you since their ancestors were slaves! I would love to see you coming here, work to support them and then be hated for the fact that you’re white. You think I made up this video? No, that’s how they truly feel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ8g_64Dmug

  • Masha

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ8g_64Dmug
    “Ya’ll should be working not watching this video and supporting me and my childrens! I love America!”
    Hopey, you wanna be part of it? You think it’s a single case? You said you will rather pay taxes in order to support niggers. There you go. Support them, be hated and made fun of by them

  • Fa

    Masha, come here and pay up to 50% tax to support Chechen and Ingush. Search in yandex Russian taxpayer money Chechnya

    Feel better now?

  • Masha

    “You want to dismiss statistics of US Government, that includes WW2 vets and Vietnam vets. Why should it exclude them if they are still alife and if they still receive welfare?”
    So it’s an absolutely identical case where a man with no legs receives help after fighting in a war just like a woman in her 20’s who is perfectly healthy but lives off of my taxes cause she has 3 kids from 3 different baby’s daddys and prefers to smoke weed instead of working.

  • Fa

    No, I didn’t think it was OK. I think that having a child is a huge responsibility and a woman should be careful with whom she would have one.

    But the truth is white men and women do that all the time too. It’s not something that is reseved for black race only.

    You think that Daniel’s wife for example, who popped out two kids in her teens prior meeting Daniel, was not a welfare recepient?

  • Fa

    Do you think it was ok that she threw fork at the little boy applying such strength to it that it got stuck in the child’s knee?
    Do you think that it is OK that he said nothing to this and keeps calling himself a Christian and keeps whining at this forum seeking sympathy while he had none, for the kid?

    Do you think that she herself, by behavior and by the age, is essencially a child and there is something wrong when an eldery man marries a poor woman like that?

    Of course I believe that when pedophiles, like eldery catholic priests do what they do to the children, in their head they rationalize it and call those types of relationship “love” too.

  • Fa

    This is the HARVARD study on the subject that you keep talking about citing Pulizer Prize winner sociologists:

    http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=102223

    Truth is, majority of welfare recepients are not black and are women and not vets. The majority of welfare recepients are WHITE CHILDREN.

    White children are responsibility of WHITE MALES.

  • Fa

    So reality is, Masha. That IF and just IF you consider to marry someone with prospect of having a kid, statistically odds are against you already and there is at least 50% of chance that you will divorce and a WHITE MALE may not stick around. However if a white male in Russia abandons you and the kids - you will prove nothing in court, you will receive no help (well 200 -600 russian rubles a month is nothing and you cannot survive on the money with a kid) while in the US or anywhere else in Western world you will be receiving substantial aid and will be able to survive on the money. So just based on facts of procreation statistically backed reality is that it is better to stay in the US rather than move back to Russian Federation.

    I think some man here, Igor or Ivan I think posted here previously that he personally uses services of single mom women and cited the price $100 in Moscow I think it was and less somewhere else. You understand that they fuck “men” like him not out of desire to fuck or out of the good life?

  • hopeychangey

    I thought I was leaving, but returned after 8 hours, and changed my name to “fa”. Short for Fucking Asshole, which I enjoy having done to me. Packing fudge is my favorite. Fair Dinkum.

  • Fa

    Daniel, you want me to remove myself so that you, dirty old man can continue your whine about how your child abusing wife doesn’t understand your pedophilic self?

  • Fa

    Your piece “I am drunk, my wife has many good qualities x10 Fair Dinkum x 20″ was very profound.

  • Fa

    Oh I missed that part when you (apparently under influence of alcohol) wrote that she purchased vibrator and prefers it to you.
    You are deep, deep person, Daniel. A pillar of Christian man. Your “family” is ah…what all the world should look up to.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>