Lonestar20x20.gif

Twitter

No Legal Right

Kaliningrad_War_Memorial

Konigsberg was overrun by the Red Army 1945. And any encyclo today will tell you it’s been part of Russia ever since. But as Raymond A. Smith points out, Russia has never held any formal legal title to the Oblast at all.

At the end of the war, Germany was being given away by the Allies like at a garage sale. Actually, totally against the Hague Laws of War of 1907. In this illegal way, Germany lost some 25% of its pre-war territory.

Prussia was abolished. So too were Pomerania and Silesia, following the bizarre arrangement in which the whole of Poland was simply ’shunted to the left and up a bit’. The Americans, who by this time were calling the shots, probably couldn’t even pronounce Pomerania, let alone point to it on a map.

Hey, Where The Fuck Is Pomerania?

Yalta_Conference

The arbitrary line delineating the southern border of the Kaliningrad Oblast was drawn by Stalin - they say on the back of fag packet at Yalta. The Great Powers always meant to have experts look at this border in detail, but never quite got around to it.

Moreover, Stalin’s stated claims to the Konigsberg region - because the Soviets wanted revenge and an ice-free port - never had any basis in International Law either. But the Red Army were there and not going away any time soon. So really, Kaliningrad was born out of muddle, bluff and procrastination. All Stalin ever had on paper was an acknowledgement of temporary administration pending review.

So why hasn’t any smart-ass International Lawyer brought all this up before? Basically, the Cold War intervened and no one wanted to poke the Bear with a stick. To be fair to participants, the Potsdam Conference of 1945 envisaged that many territorial issues concerning Germany would be buttoned down at a subsequent meeting - the ‘Final Settlement’. But again, due to the Cold War, this next meeting didn’t happen until forty five years later - not until the re-unification of Germany in 1990. Here, the contentious issue of Kaliningrad was sensitively left off the agenda.

In so doing, as Raymond Smith puts it, the precise legal status of Kaliningrad in International Law has been forever ‘lost in transit’.

Source

Share/Save/Bookmark

4 comments to No Legal Right

  • Aleks

    (Not that I’m in any way going to compare Milosevic’s Serbia to Hitler’s Germany, though there are some parallels) but it seems the same formula has been applied over 50 years later in 1999 where the legal status is also very messy (SCR 1244(?)).

    A few years of temporary administration and then….

    What a mess, and now China, Russia and a host of other states have taken up the cudgels… Or am I just whistlin’ in the wind???

  • copydude

    Some historians suggest that Stalin knew his claim was tenuous, which was why he totally eradicated anything German from the area - people, place names, buildings, you name it. It all helps to accomplish a fait accompli.

    Ironically, this was also in contravention of the Hague Laws of 1907 - which were largely framed by a Russian.

  • [...] noted earlier that wiping Prussia off the map in 1945 was always wobbly in International Law. Many recommendations of the Potsdam Conference - [...]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>